Interest in AI-assisted grading is growing across the Dutch education system. By automating repetitive tasks, teachers can save time in a profession already facing significant workload pressures. AI is therefore seen as a practical tool to improve efficiency and free up time for activities such as student guidance and interaction.

However, the use of AI in assessment also introduces new risks. Experts point to potential errors, bias in algorithms and limited transparency in how decisions are made. Since it is often unclear how an AI system arrives at a specific evaluation, human oversight remains crucial.

Within the education sector, there is broad agreement that AI should be used as a supporting tool rather than a replacement for teachers. Final responsibility for grading must remain with educators, particularly when assessments directly impact students’ academic progress. A hybrid approach, combining human judgment with technological support, is increasingly seen as the most balanced solution.

This discussion reflects a broader trend of AI becoming embedded in core organisational processes. In education, the key challenge is to balance efficiency with quality, ensuring that trust and accountability remain central.