< Back to news 


20 June 2024
70% of Dutch People Don’t Use Generative AI
A survey by the University of Amsterdam's AlgoSoc AI Opinion Monitor reveals that 70% of Dutch people have not used generative AI like ChatGPT. However, attitudes and usage differ by age. Researchers Ernesto de León, Fabio Votta, Theo Araujo, and Claes de Vreese surveyed nearly 4,000 respondents and will continue this study for the next three years.
AI Use and Age Differences
The survey shows a significant age gap in AI usage. Among 16 to 24-year-olds, 74% have used generative AI in the past year. In contrast, 74% of those 25 and older have never used it. "Young people are more comfortable with new technologies," says de Vreese, a lead researcher.
Recognition of AI Content
Although many do not use AI tools, 85% of respondents believe they have encountered AI-generated content online. However, most feel incapable of recognizing it, rating their ability to spot AI content at 2.58 out of 7. They believe journalists are best at detecting AI-generated content.
Future Monitoring
The AlgoSoc team will continue tracking public attitudes towards AI. "As AI use expands, especially in sectors like healthcare, we will monitor and address any concerns," de León states. This research will help understand the evolving relationship between the Dutch public and AI, informing future discussions and policies.
Published by the UvA.
Vergelijkbaar >
Similar news items

April 16, 2025
AWS: Dutch businesses are adopting AI faster than the European average
New research from AWS shows that Dutch businesses are rapidly adopting AI—at a rate of one new implementation every four minutes, well ahead of the European average.
read more >

April 16, 2025
Submit your nomination for the Dutch Applied AI Award 2025
Do you know or develop an innovative AI application? Submit it now for the 2025 Dutch Applied AI Award, presented at the Computable Awards.
read more >

April 16, 2025
UK government tests AI to predict murders
The UK government is developing an AI system that could predict who is most likely to commit a serious crime. Critics call the project dangerous and discriminatory.
read more >